Request assessment

Oil & gas

Completion risk control for oil and gas process facilities, FPSO topsides, LNG, brownfield and complex module delivery environments.
Construction installation progress on an industrial site
Industry challenge

Oil and gas projects carry dense system boundaries, safety-critical equipment, pressure testing, loop checks, preservation, vendor packages and high interface dependency. A small readiness gap can block commissioning access across entire subsystems.

Outcome icon
How Proofdatum helps

We strengthen construction-to-commissioning control through field verification, system readiness scoring, punch closure governance, PCMS and schedule integration, MC skyline alignment and independent handover assurance.

Completion risk and gap analysis icon
Relevant risks

Late reinstatement, incomplete pressure testing evidence, unresolved punch A/B items, vendor package close-out gaps, PSV and flange management exposure, preservation degradation and commissioning access conflicts.

20+Years in project completions
US$30bn+Capital project value supported
140,000+Inspections and tests driven to close-out

Typically delivered through

10-Day Rapid Completion Assessment90-Day Completion Control DeploymentHandover Recovery

Common questions

Where does completion risk concentrate on oil and gas projects?
Around the transition from area-based construction to system-based commissioning. Dense subsystem boundaries, safety-critical loops, pressure-test evidence and vendor packages all converge there, and that is where verified status matters most.
Can Proofdatum work alongside our EPC’s completion team?
Yes. The EPC retains delivery responsibility. Proofdatum provides the owner with independent verification of readiness, punch and evidence, so acceptance decisions rest on proof rather than reporting. Proofdatum can also support the EPC’s completion team directly, strengthening completion systems, coaching teams and preparing handover evidence for owner scrutiny, or serve as the project’s common completion assurance function across owner and EPC, where one independent set of completion evidence serves both sides.
How is preservation handled in the completion picture?
Preservation is treated as completion evidence: verified as current, recorded against tags and subsystems, and carried visibly into commissioning rather than discovered as degradation at start-up.
Does the approach cover brownfield and tie-in work?
Yes, with tighter custody rules: live-plant boundaries, isolation and reinstatement discipline, and punch control held across shutdown windows.
Do you support LNG and process facilities as well as upstream?
Yes. The control model is facility-agnostic: LNG trains, process plants, refineries and upstream developments hand over the same way, subsystem by subsystem, on verified evidence.

Industries we support: Industries overview · Renewables · Infrastructure & Industrial · Offshore Developments

Other sectors

Offshore developmentsRenewablesInfrastructure & industrialIndustries overview
Assess completion readiness before handover risk becomes schedule exposure.
Request a Rapid Completion Assessment